<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>7 一堆古怪的链表 on 编程那些事儿</title><link>https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/</link><description>Recent content in 7 一堆古怪的链表 on 编程那些事儿</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 21:05:58 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>7.1 双单向链表</title><link>https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/7.1-double-single/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:06:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/7.1-double-single/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;原文链接: &lt;a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/infinity-double-single.html"&gt;https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/infinity-double-single.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;我们在双向链表上挣扎，是因为所有权语义纠缠不清：没有哪个节点严格「拥有」另一个节点。但我们之所以挣扎，是因为带着对链表&lt;em&gt;是什么&lt;/em&gt;的成见——默认所有链接都朝同一方向。&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>7.2 栈上分配的链表</title><link>https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/7.2-stack-allocated-linked-list/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:06:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://before80.github.io/prgms/Rust/tooManyLists/sillyLists/7.2-stack-allocated-linked-list/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;原文链接: &lt;a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/infinity-stack-allocated.html"&gt;https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/infinity-stack-allocated.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;本书 largely 聚焦&lt;em&gt;堆分配&lt;/em&gt;链表，因为最常见实用，但不&lt;em&gt;必须&lt;/em&gt;堆分配。堆分配 nice 因为动态分配内存容易。栈分配在这方面 less friendly——像 C 的 &lt;code&gt;alloca&lt;/code&gt; widely regarded 为 Very Cursed And Problematic。&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>